(Recapitulation.) “At that time,” it says, “Herod the king stretched forth his hands to afflict certain of the Church.” Like a wild beast, he attacked all indiscriminately and without consideration. This is what Christ said: “My cup indeed you shall drink, and with the baptism wherewith I am baptized, shall you be baptized.” (b) “And he killed James the brother of John.” For there was also another James, the brother of the Lord: therefore to distinguish him, he says, “The brother of John.” Do you mark that the sum of affairs rested in these three, especially Peter and James?
(a) And how was it he did not kill Peter immediately? It mentions the reason: “it was the day of unleavened bread:” and he wished rather to make a display (ἐ κπομπεὕσαι) with the killing of him. “And when he saw it pleased the Jews.” For their own part, they now in consequence of Gamaliel's advice, abstained from bloodshedding: and besides, did not even invent accusations; but by means of others they compassed the same results. (c) This (counsel of Gamaliel's) above all was their condemnation: for the preaching was shown to be no longer a thing of men.
“He proceeded further to kill Peter also.” In very deed was that fulfilled, “We are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.” “Seeing,” it says, “it was a pleasing thing to the Jews.” A pleasing thing, bloodshed, and unrighteous bloodshed, wickedness, impiety! He ministered to their senseless (ἀ τόποις) lusts: for, whereas he ought to have done the contrary, to check their rage, he made them more eager, as if he were an executioner, and not a physician to their diseased minds.
(And this) though he had numberless warnings in the case of both his grandfather and his father Herod, how the former in consequence of his putting the children to death suffered the greatest calamities, and the latter by slaying John raised up against himself a grievous war. But as they thought * * He feared lest Peter, in consequence of the slaying of James, should withdraw; and wishing to have him in safe keeping, he put him in prison: “and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers”: the stricter the custody, the more wondrous the display.
“Peter therefore was kept in prison.” But this was all the better for Peter, who was thereby made more approved, and evinced his own manly courage. And it says, “there was earnest prayer making.” It was the prayer of (filial) affection: it was for a father they asked, a father mild. “There was,” it says, “earnest prayer.” Hear how they were affected to their teachers. No factions, no perturbation: but they betook them to prayer, to that alliance which is indeed invincible, to this they betook them for refuge.
They did not say, “What? I, poor insignificant creature that I am, to pray for him!” for, as they acted of love, they did not give these things a thought. And observe, it was during the feast, that (their enemies) brought these trials upon them, that their worth might be the more approved. “And when Herod,” etc. See Peter sleeping, and not in distress or fear! That same night, after which he was to be brought forth, he slept, having cast all upon God. “Between two soldiers, bound with two chains.” Mark, how strict the ward!
“And says, Arise.” The guards were asleep with him, and therefore perceived nothing of what was happening. “And a light shined.” What was the light for? In order that Peter might see as well as hear, and not imagine it to be all fancy. And the command, “Arise quickly,” that he may not be remiss. He also smote him; so deeply did he sleep. (a) “Rise,” says he, “quickly:” this is not to hurry him (θορυβοὕντος) but to persuade him not to delay. (c) “And” immediately “his chains fell off from his hands.”
(b) How? Answer me: where are the heretics?— let them answer. “And the Angel said unto him,” etc. by this also convincing him that it is no fancy: to this end he bids him gird himself and put on his shoes, that he may shake off his sleep, and know that it is real. (a) (e) “And he knew not that it was true that was done by the Angel, but thought he saw a vision”: (e) well he might, by reason of the excessive greatness (ὑ περβολὴν) of the things taking place.
Do you mark what a thing it is for a miracle to be excessive (ὑ περβολὴ σημείου)? How it amazes (ἐ κπλήττει) the beholder? How it will not let the thing be believed? For if Peter “thought he saw a vision,” though he had girded himself and put on his shoes, what would have been the case with another? “And,” it says, “when they had passed the first and the second ward, they came to the iron gate, which opened unto them of its own accord”: and yet the things that had happened within (the prison) were more marvellous: but this was now more after the manner of man.
“And having gone out, they went along one street and immediately (all 'until') the Angel departed from him.” When there was no hindrance, then the Angel departed. For Peter would not have gone along (προἥλθεν), there being so many hindrances. “And when he came to himself:” for in very truth, it was indeed an amazement (ἔ κπληξις). “Now,” says he, “I know”— now, not then, when I was in the prison—“that the Lord has sent His Angel, and has delivered me out of the hand of Herod and from all the expectation of the people of the Jews.
And when he had considered”, it says: viz. where he was, or, that he must not without more ado depart but requite his Benefactor: “he came to the house of Mary the mother of John.” Who is this John? Probably he that was always with them: for this is why he adds his distinctive name (τὸ παράσημον), “whose surname was Mark.” But observe, “praying” in the night, how much they got by it: what a good thing affliction is; how wakeful it made them! Do you see how great the gain resulting from the death of Stephen?
Do you see how great the benefit accruing from this imprisonment? For it is not by taking vengeance upon those who wronged them that God shows the greatness of the Gospel: but in the wrong-doers themselves, without any harm happening to those, he shows what a mighty thing the afflictions in themselves are, that we may not seek in any wise deliverance from them, nor the avenging of our wrongs. And mark how the very servant-girls were henceforth upon an equality with them. “For joy,” it says, “she opened not.”
(<!--<span class="stiki"></span>-->v. 13, 14.) This too is well done, that they likewise may not be amazed by seeing him at once, and that they may be incredulous, and their minds may be exercised. “But ran in,” etc. just as we are wont to do, she was eager to be herself the bringer of the good tidings, for good news it was indeed. “And they said unto her, You are mad: but she constantly affirmed that it was even so: then said they, It is his Angel.” This is a truth, that each man has an Angel. And what would the Angel? It was from the time (of night) that they surmised this.
But when he “continued knocking, and when they had opened, and saw him, they were astonished. But he beckoning to them with his hand” (<!--<span class="stiki"></span>-->v. 16, 17), made them keep quiet, to hear all that had happened to him. He was now an object of more affectionate desire to the disciples, not only in consequence of his being saved, but by his sudden coming in upon them and straightway departing. Now, both his friends learn all clearly; and the aliens also learn, if they had a mind, but they had not.
The same thing happened in the case of Christ. “Tell these things,” he says, “to James, and to the brethren.” How free from all vainglory! Nor did he say, Make known these things to people everywhere, but, “to the brethren. And he withdrew to another place:” for he did not tempt God, nor fling himself into temptation: since, when they were commanded to do this, then they did it. “Go,” it was said, “speak in the temple to the people.” But this the Angel said not (here); on the contrary, by silently removing him and bringing him out by night, he gave him free permission to withdraw— and this too is done, that we may learn that many things are providentially brought about after the manner of men— so that he should not again fall into peril.— For that they may not say, “It was his Angel,” after he had gone, they say this first, and then they see himself overthrowing their notion of the matter.
Had it been the Angel, he would have knocked at the door, would not have retired to another place. And what followed in the day, make them sure.
Source: Homilies on Acts (New Advent)