The Banquet of the Ten Virgins

But what need is there to protract the argument by using such examples? For nature could not thus, in a little time, accomplish so great a work without divine help. For who gave to the bones their fixed nature? And who bound the yielding members with nerves, to be extended and relaxed at the joints? Or who prepared channels for the blood, and a soft windpipe for the breath? Or what god caused the humours to ferment, mixing them with blood and forming the soft flesh out of the earth, but only the Supreme Artist making us to be man, the rational and living image of Himself, and forming it like wax, in the womb, from moist slight seed?

Or by whose providence was it that the foetus was not suffocated by damp when shut up within, in the connection of the vessels? Or who, after it was brought forth and had come into the light, changed it from weakness and smallness to size, and beauty, and strength, unless God Himself, the Supreme Artist, as I said, making by His creative power copies of Christ, and living pictures? Whence, also, we have received from the inspired writings, that those who are begotten, even though it be in adultery, are committed to guardian angels.

But if they came into being in opposition to the will and the decree of the blessed nature of God, how should they be delivered over to angels, to be nourished with much gentleness and indulgence? And how, if they had to accuse their own parents, could they confidently, before the judgment seat of Christ, invoke Him and say, “You did not, O Lord, grudge us this common light; but these appointed us to death, despising Your command?”“For,” He says, “children begotten of unlawful beds are witnesses of wickedness against their parents at their trial.”